Enough Beating about the Bush: the Dark Side of Bush Regeneration

I almost threw out the plumbing newsletter that appeared in my mailbox today, dismissing it as mere junk-mail. Thank god I did read it, though, otherwise I may never have benefited from the wonderfully informative and moderate warning contained within: ‘Trees are pretty… but sometimes EVIL!’ (capitalisation not my own.) Below this headline (yes, it was a headline) was a cartoon of a tree, (presumably in one of its intermittent evil phases), with glowing red eyes and a fiery, dragon-like visage, gripping a poor innocent sewerage pipe in its claws (yes, the tree had claws – and long hooked fingernails too, as it happens.)

I pondered the cartoon for a few minutes, half-regretting voting for the Greens at the last election. The ad seemed to be saying that sewage was far more important then nature and that if it came down to choosing between the two, our sympathies should clearly reside with the former. But was this plumbing advertisement an accurate depiction of reality? Were trees really as malicious as it made out? Had I been naive in viewing them for so many years purely as non-sentient objects; beautiful green receptacles of chlorophyll and breezes, residing somewhere outside the moral sphere of right and wrong? And if so, and this advertisement spoke the truth, shouldn’t we be cutting down more of them rather than trying to preserve them (and possibly chaining ourselves to imperilled drainpipes as well)?

I’m just being stupid and facetious of course – entertaining myself with these thoughts –  because it is ridiculous to think of a tree as being good or evil, coarse or refined, vindictive or benevolent, demure or lascivious. Yet trees – plants– all the nature that surrounds us – are more than just inanimate objects, have a life and soul of their own, beyond our construction of them. It seems wrong for us to view them as subjects, things to be controlled. I don’t quite know what I mean by all this; there’s just vague feelings, a sense that we should revere nature rather than demonise it, a random string of memories forming…

It’s Spring. I’m going back home, back to the house I grew up in, passing gardens massed with colour, banks of pink and white azaleas. Boughs of ivory jasmine laze over fence-tops. Wisteria tumbles from verandah railings, its heady fragrance sugaring the air. The sun is out. A broad blue sky stretches over me as I walk.

And then I turn the corner and my buoyant mood rapidly deflates. My mother has often expressed the belief that only a person without a soul would be able to cut down a tree. If this is the case, our local council is surely staffed by legions of the infernal damned – and no doubt headed by Faust himself – for every tree on the block has been cut down.

The street before...

What used to be a pleasant, leafy boulevarde has been transformed into a landscape reminiscent of the blasted battle-fields of WWI. The trees weren’t ‘appropriate’ for the local environment, I learn later. ‘Have you seen what they’ve done to that stretch of R. Street?’ residents say to each other when they first sight the ‘improvements’, speaking in shocked, subdued tones as if referring to a woman disfigured by the Taliban for wearing nail polish.

...and after.

One can only suppose that the urban planner responsible for this revised streetscape was given a brief containing the words ‘bleak’, ‘barren’ and ‘apocalyptic’. Or perhaps they simply mistook the film The Road for some type of documentary on effective street design, rather than a dystopian vision of the future (that would at least explain all of the abandoned oil tankers and bands of cannibals roaming around…)

My mother was very upset about the trees being removed and called the council to tell them so. When she finally got through to the person responsible, she was told that residents of the street had been warned and given the opportunity to voice any concerns. No-one had, however. In fact, according to the council representative, she was the only person to express any displeasure at all.
Like her, I found this patently difficult to believe. Unless the whole block had recently been bought out by the Royal Society for the Blind, I cannot accept that not one resident would have a problem with changes that made their property more exposed, less protected from the hot afternoon sun and generally uglier. But it’s useless trying to make this type of point to the council.

 Why? Not just because for as long as I can remember they have demonstrated a lamentable blindness to beauty and aesthetics, but because in much the same way that the mafia is apparently in league with the major drug cartels, the council is in league with bush regenerators.

 Bush regeneration has become quite fashionable in Australia lately. For those not familiar with the term, it’s basically an ecological practice relating to the propagation and restoration of indigenous plants. Most often, bush regeneration activity consists of pulling up weeds and planting more native species.  I like to refer to it as bush-Nazism – a type of thinking completely incompatible with Australian ideals of multiculturalism and inclusiveness. And I’m sure this type of parochial, bush regeneration mentality had something to do with the trees in R. Street being cut down.

Another example: one of the great joys of my teenage years was wondering down to the vacant lot near my house and coming back with armfuls of freesias. Literally armfuls – I’m not using the term hyperbolically, but am instead referring to piles of flowers so plentiful that like Hansel and Gretel, you could leave a steady trail behind you as you walked back home without noticing any diminishment at the end. They were beautiful things too: filmy ivory trumpets which sparkled with gold dust in the sunlight. I had always preferred the wild ones, with tattered edges like an orphan’s cloak, to the more refined, cultivated variety, and they were here en masse.  Strewn through the long grass, they transformed an ordinary roadside into a glade dotted with dancing sprites.  You would wade through the knee-high grass, arms laden with rose-tinged, violet-hued, flannel-yellow flowers. There was something joyful, impossible, absurd about the largesse of it – the abundance  – like Forster’s field of violets. It was an almost bridal-luxury. And they were just there for the taking.

Of course, they pulled the freesias up – they weren’t native. Never mind that they were beautiful and did no-one any harm.

More evidence: in the middle of my parents’ street was a nature strip planted with trees, bushes and ferns. It gave some measure of privacy, so that when you looked out your front window, you gazed into a sea of greenery rather than into the lounge-room of the house across the road. Directly outside my parents’ house is a jacaranda tree which becomes a glorious cloud of violet in summer. When I was younger, each December we would collect the twisted goblin-faced pods which fell to the ground, sticking cotton wool and goggle-eyes on them and transforming them into leering Santa Clauses. There used to be broom as well, a shrub with glossy green spines and flowers like bright yellow butterflies. It was always one of my favourite plants, and when I was younger, I used to pick the honey-scented blossoms and arrange them in a coal-black vase, the sable and gold forming a striking contrast. Anyway, you can probably guess where this is going…

The council recently decided to ‘regenerate’ the nature strip. Nearly all of the plants were pulled up or poisoned.  My lovely old broom went, along with most of the other plants. They were replaced by some limp native grasses which flop on the ground like a comb-over on a balding man. Now you look straight at the house opposite, the stark red bricks and blank windows staring back like an accusing face.

My mother had no idea beforehand that the council was going to do this. She had happened to look outside one morning and saw a man in khaki unearthing shrubs in great enthusiastic handfuls. I can just imagine her tearing outside to confront him, hands planted on her hips, fierce: ‘You are NOT cutting down that jacaranda are you?’ she would have demanded rather than asked.

‘Umm, no,’ he’d have floundered, thrown by her queenly indignation.

‘You are NOT cutting it down,’ she would have said again, even more firmly, and he would have acceded to her greater will.

So the jacaranda tree survived the massacre at least, but as Mum often says with a shiver, one can only imagine what would have happened if she hadn’t been home that day.

They’ve planted new trees on R.  street now, spindly pathetic things that are apparently far more appropriate for the local environment. I’m sure that one day they’ll be big and flourishing, though I regret all the years that will pass before that happens. I regret too the fields of freesias gone.

I went to visit my parents again, a few weeks after the council’s regeneration attempt.  My mother had just come back from a walk and was cradling a little seedling she had found by the road and had brought back home. ‘Can you give me a minute?’ she said. ‘I just want to replant this in the nature strip. I’m not sure what it is, but I thought it was pretty.’  

Each time I come back home, she shows me how the plant is getting on. It’s growing, and there are others beside it that are growing too.  

About these ads

About bakersdaughterwrites

What to say? I’m a 30-something year old woman from Sydney notorious for changing her mind. I have a cat named Seraphina Nightingale, whic
This entry was posted in Miscellaneous and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

11 Responses to Enough Beating about the Bush: the Dark Side of Bush Regeneration

  1. Grad says:

    On no! Please tell me they didn’t cut down those beautiful trees? I’m sitting here in shock. In reading your piece, I was certain you were speaking of Savannah, GA. The lovely azaleas, the wisteria, the jasmine are all grown in abundance here. I have an arbor upon which grows Confederate Jasmine and Carolina Jessamine, and when it blooms it surely is close to what Heaven must smell like. In stark contrast to what you described, our trees are pretty much protected. When a Live Oak stands in the way of a new road, the road must move, not the tree. One of our main roads on the island where I live goes this way, and then that way, to specifically avoid trees. Swamp magnolia or other scrubby trees aren’t as sacred, but I guarantee you, if that road you show in your picture was located here, the city and/or county would have forbidden the destruction of the trees. And tell your Mom to keep up the fight! Good for her.

    • Oh dear – I have to confess that this isn’t actually a picture of the street. I didn’t have a photograph, so just googled ‘pretty tree-lined street’ or something equally trite, and thought this image captured the spirit best. And now I’m trying to amend my caption to sound less misleading, and of course the stupid capricious computer isn’t cooperating with me…

      But the actual street was very lovely – though the trees were perhaps not quite as large and majestic-looking as the ones depicted. And it was extremely sad to see how bereft the street looked without them.

      Your arbour sounds gorgeous – and Georgia certainly seems to have it’s priorities straight when it comes to the environment. It’s a place I’d love to visit one day.

      And I agree with you – good on my mum. Thank god there are people like her who care.

  2. Grad says:

    P.S. Your post of Sept. 14 was fab.

  3. That is the saddest thing I’ve heard today. I understand that non-native plants can take over, but cutting down beautiful trees that give privacy, shade, and help return oxygen to the atmosphere — how can this be a good thing? That’s tragic.

  4. RubyTwoShoes says:

    They must be on a city wide rampage because when I turned up at Playgroup last week the entire yard had been shorn, leaving the play space bare, bold, exposed, and HOT. The tree that beautifully shaded the sandpit was completely cut down, and any complaints about children’s head being burnt to a crisp while they played, were met with “just buy a sun shade”. Um, as in, a tree?!

    The ‘intrinsic value’ of nature that you touched on at the start reminded me of some of the philosophies of Deep Ecology (I never got over familiar with it, being a tad lazy and a poor student generally) but you may find it of interest to check out….

    • That’s so stupid, isn’t it? Teach that playgroup a lesson by suing when your child gets sunburnt, I say! Actually, no – please don’t. That would just make me even more depressed about the state of our society.

      Am not familar with Deep Ecology but it sounds interesting. Will consult the ever- trusty Wikipedia…

  5. Pete says:

    Sorry to hear about those lovely trees in your street getting chopped down. We also have a drive against what are called ‘invasive alien vegetation’ here (mainly types of Acacia from Australia ironically). And as much as I love our indigenous forests here, I’m all for balance and flexibility when it comes to tree management. Well done to your mum for giving them hell.

  6. doctordi says:

    And Grad – and Pete too! Oh, it’s like turning up to a party and knowing more people than you thought you would! And don’t get me STARTED on the systematic uglification of Sydney. Please. It actually makes me cry. Why do councillors right across the city all appear to have something against natural beauty? I really don’t understand it, but they’re evidently determined to wreck it wherever it may be found. An absolute tragedy.

    • We must be lurking around the same blogs – how sinister!

      According to the City of Sydney website, a blindness to aethetic beauty is a prerequisite for a job in local government. Also a fondness for issuing parking tickets.

  7. litlove says:

    Your wonderful writing and inventive perspective bring a whole other dimension to this piece. As for the content, yes, the world is slowly but surely going mad, and ripping up flourishing nature on ideological grounds is undeniably a step down that route. Or just the place where the resentment and dislike of multi-culturalism has to be played out, in the absence of any other sanctioned arena. I really don’t think everyone is as on board with difference as we may them wish to be.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s